Anchor and Anchor Chain Tests: SOLAS, Class Requirements
- Details
- Category: Enseñanzas náuticas, formación, cursos
- Published on Monday, 26 January 2026 07:35
- Written by Administrator2
- Hits: 245
Marine Public
Proof loads, breaking tests and certification for maritime anchors

QUICK ANSWER: ANCHOR AND CHAIN TESTING ESSENTIALS
Anchor Tests Required:
► Proof load test for all anchors exceeding 76 kg
► Drop test for cast steel anchors where required by Class
► Material tests on sample pieces per approved standards
► Visual and dimensional inspection after testing
► Freedom from cracks, deformation or defects confirmed
Chain Cable Testing:
• Proof load test on entire 27.5 m shackle length
• Breaking load test on additional sacrificial links
• Applies to chain cables 12.5 mm diameter and above
• Dimensional verification of link length, breadth and diameter
• Two successive link failures result in rejection
• Material quality verification before mechanical testing
Anchor Certificate Contents:
► Anchor type and weight excluding stock
► Stock weight for stocked anchors
► Shank and arm lengths in millimeters
► Proof load applied in tonnes
► Test certificate number and official Class mark
► Approved testing house identification
► Date of test and authorized surveyor signature
► Head weight specification
Chain Certificate Information:
• Cable type, grade and diameter in millimeters
• Total length in meters and weight in kilograms
• Link dimensions: length and breadth
• Proof load and breaking load in tonnes
• Certifying authority name and stamp
• Testing establishment details
• Certificate or serial number
• Authorized surveyor signature
• Details of accessories supplied if applicable
ANCHOR EVOLUTION AND MODERN DEMANDS
Anchoring systems trace back to 6000 BC when stone-filled baskets served as primitive ground tackle in Egyptian waters. The progression from simple weight principles to sophisticated fluke designs reflects maritime development spanning millennia. Modern shipping created unprecedented challenges as vessel sizes exploded beyond traditional anchor design parameters.
Offshore industry expansion forced radical rethinking of anchor capabilities, windlass braking systems and cable lifting equipment. The equipment evolved through hook principles seen in traditional patterns, spade concepts incorporated in plough designs, and pure weight systems used in mooring configurations. Each development addressed specific operational needs while maintaining reliability under demanding conditions.
Industry Growth Impact:
• Vessel deadweight increased from 25,000 to 500,000 tonnes
• Anchor weights scaled disproportionately to ship size
• Traditional ratios became inadequate for modern vessels
• Chain handling systems required complete redesign
• Stowage methods adapted to space constraints
❕ Important: IACS clearly states that anchoring equipment serves temporary mooring in harbors or sheltered areas only. The system cannot hold vessels off exposed coasts in rough weather or stop ships that are moving or drifting.
ANCHOR TYPES AND CHARACTERISTICS
Three dominant designs emerged over centuries, each addressing specific operational requirements. The stockless configuration dominates modern merchant fleets while traditional patterns persist in specialized applications. High holding power variants developed specifically for large tankers where conventional designs proved inadequate.
Admiralty Pattern Configuration
This traditional design remains popular within fishing operations despite challenging stowage characteristics. The stock positioning at right angles to the shank forces flukes into the seabed upon release. One fluke remains exposed during use, creating potential cable fouling when vessels swing with tide or wind changes.
Design Specifications:
► Stock weight equals 25% of total anchor weight
► Straight stock design for anchors exceeding 610 kg
► Bent stock configuration below 610 kg
► Holding power reaches 3-4 times anchor weight
► Stock removes via forelock for parallel stowage
► Longer shank dimensions improve holding capacity
► Merchant vessel use limited to kedge applications
► Maximum weight rarely exceeds two tonnes
✔ Tip: The stock length and weight exceed the arm dimensions, ensuring it drags flat along the seabed and angles flukes into digging position.
Stockless Anchor Dominance
Modern merchant shipping relies almost exclusively on this design due to superior stowing properties. The head connects to the shank via hinged bolt allowing arm rotation up to 45 degrees. Built-in stops prevent excessive rotation when the head meets the shank at maximum angle.
|
Component |
Material |
|---|---|
|
Flukes, arms, crown |
Cast steel |
|
Shank |
Cast steel or forged iron |
|
Hinge bolt |
Forged iron |
|
Shackle |
Forged iron |
Operational Advantages:
• Houses easily in hawse pipe when secured
• Eliminates need for traditional anchor beds
• Head weight minimum three-fifths of total weight
• Holding power approximately four times anchor weight
• Simple handling for all anchor operations
❕ Important: Rotating arm action may cause choking on the seabed, reducing fluke angle and diminishing holding power effectiveness.
High Holding Power Development
Massive tanker construction demanded anchors with capabilities beyond conventional stockless designs. The AC14 type emerged with more than twice the holding power of equivalent weight stockless anchors. Classification societies granted 25% weight reduction recognizing superior performance characteristics.
Performance Features:
► Prefabricated fluke construction optimizes holding
► Fluke angle operates up to 35 degrees to shank
► Hinge pin mechanism similar to stockless operation
► Specialized anchor beds facilitate smoother deployment
► Warship and merchant service widespread adoption
► Designed specifically for large vessel requirements
Specialized Mooring Anchors
CQR plough-share design excels in mooring applications for smaller vessels. Ground type dependency affects holding power, but effectiveness and drag resistance prove superior in practical use. Stowage difficulties mirror Admiralty pattern limitations despite stock modifications introduced later.
CQR Characteristics:
• Excellent resistance to dragging forces
• Holding power dependent on seabed composition
• Modified design incorporates stock for mooring
• Preferred over Danforth for dedicated anchoring
• Basic principles sometimes surpass practical experience
Danforth Competition:
• Stock passes through crown allowing easy stowage
• Holding power reaches 14 times anchor weight
• Tendency to glide before flukes bite seabed
• Stock position prevents cable fouling
• Tripping palms positioned near centerline
• Spade-shaped flukes dig effectively once tripped
• Popular in American small-boat market
❔ Did you know? Small-boat owners typically choose between CQR and Danforth anchors. While Danforth offers easier handling, CQR provides superior holding when anchoring represents the primary purpose.
TESTING REQUIREMENTS FOR ANCHORS
SOLAS and IACS regulatory frameworks mandate specific testing protocols ensuring anchor reliability under operational loads. All anchors exceeding 76 kg undergo mandatory proof testing with certification issued by approved Class authorities upon successful completion. Testing requirements vary based on anchor type and manufacturing method.
Weight Definition Standards
Regulations specify precise weight calculations for testing purposes. Stockless anchor weight includes the anchor body together with any attached shackle. Stocked anchor weight encompasses anchor and shackle but excludes the stock itself from total weight calculations.
Weight Inclusion Rules:
► Stockless: anchor plus shackle if present
► Stocked: anchor plus shackle minus stock weight
► Minimum test threshold: 76 kg total weight
► Certificate issued for all tested anchors
► Weight determines applicable test protocols
Drop Test Requirements
Cast steel anchors undergo drop testing when required by Classification Society rules. Testing parameters and mass thresholds vary by Class approval procedures. Drop tests verify structural integrity under impact loading representing operational stresses during deployment and recovery operations.
Drop Test Parameters:
• Required for cast steel anchors per Class rules
• Test procedures defined by approving authority
• Impact orientation verifies casting soundness
• Visual inspection confirms absence of defects
• Specific drop heights established by Class
• Post-drop examination verifies integrity
✔ Tip: Drop test requirements differ between Classification Societies. Always verify specific Class requirements applicable to your vessel's anchor equipment.
Material Testing Procedures
Material tests verify mechanical properties meet approved manufacturing standards. Sample pieces undergo testing according to specifications defined by the Classification Society and applicable material standards. Tests may include bending, tensile or impact verification depending on anchor type and manufacturing method.
Material Test Applications:
► Sample pieces tested per approved standards
► Bending tests verify ductility when specified
► Tensile tests confirm strength properties
► Impact tests assess toughness if required
► Test parameters defined by Class approval
► No fractures or defects permitted
► Results documented in test certificates
❕ Important: Material testing requirements depend on anchor manufacturing method. Cast steel, forged steel and wrought iron anchors each follow different test protocols as specified by IACS and Classification Societies.
Proof Load Application
Every anchor regardless of material faces proof load testing with loads specified by weight tables. Intermediate weight proof loads derive from linear interpolation between table values. All anchors receive annealing treatment except cast steel types subjected to additional percussion testing.
|
Anchor Weight (kg) |
Proof Load (tonne) |
|---|---|
|
100 |
3.99 |
|
500 |
11.80 |
|
1,000 |
20.30 |
|
2,500 |
42.20 |
|
5,000 |
67.40 |
|
10,000 |
97.10 |
|
20,000 |
130.00 |
|
30,000 |
140.00 |
✔ Tip: Proof loads for weights between table entries require linear interpolation calculations to determine exact test requirements.
ANCHOR MARKING STANDARDS
Permanent identification marks appear on specific anchor locations ensuring traceability throughout service life. Crown and shank both carry identical information for redundancy if one location becomes unreadable through wear or corrosion. Regulatory compliance demands complete marking visibility during inspections.
Required Mark Elements:
• Maker's name or recognized initials
• Progressive manufacturing number
• Anchor weight in appropriate units
• Test certificate number assigned
• Certifying authority letter designation
• Mark locations: crown and shank both
❕ Important: Duplicate marking on crown and shank ensures at least one readable identification remains accessible even if wear damages the other location.
ANCHOR CERTIFICATE DOCUMENTATION
Successful testing generates certificates issued by approved Class authorities containing anchor specifications and test results. Documentation provides verifiable proof of SOLAS and IACS compliance and performance capabilities. Original certificates remain with the vessel throughout operational service for surveyor and regulatory authority verification.
Certificate Contents Include:
► Anchor type designation and classification
► Weight excluding stock measured in kilograms
► Stock weight in kilograms if stocked anchor
► Shank length measurement in millimeters
► Arm length measurement in millimeters
► Proof load applied recorded in tonnes
► Approved testing house identification
► Official Class mark and certification stamp
► Test certificate serial number
► Date of test completion
► Anchor head weight specification
► Authorized surveyor name and signature
✔ Tip: Keep certificate copies in multiple secure locations as replacements require anchor re-testing or extensive documentation searches.
CHAIN CABLE TESTING PROTOCOLS
Anchor chain cable with diameter of 12.5 mm and above requires mandatory testing at approved establishments in standard 27.5 m shackle lengths. Manufacturers provide additional sacrificial links exclusively for destructive testing purposes. These sample links undergo breaking load testing before the complete shackle faces proof load verification.
Testing Sequence
Material quality verification precedes mechanical testing as supervisors confirm compliance with IACS anchor and chain cable regulations. Satisfactory breaking load results on sacrificial links are required before proceeding with proof load testing of the full shackle length. Two successive link failures during testing result in complete cable rejection regardless of remaining quality.
Test Progression:
• Material quality verification by surveyor
• Sacrificial links undergo breaking load test
• Satisfactory sample results permit proof testing
• Full shackle length receives proof load application
• Approved testing machines perform all tests
• Dimensional verification of link parameters
• Two consecutive failures cause rejection
• Certificate issued upon successful completion
❕ Important: Chain cable testing requirements apply to cables with diameter of 12.5 mm and above, not only cables exceeding 12.5 mm. This threshold represents the minimum diameter requiring mandatory testing.
Cable Material Classifications
Chain manufacture has historically employed wrought iron, forged mild steel, cast steel or special quality forged steel. Wrought iron demonstrates lower strength than alternatives and carries higher production costs, resulting in rare modern merchant vessel use. Grade classifications define tensile ranges and manufacturing methods.
|
Grade |
Material |
Manufacturing |
Tensile (kg/mm²) |
|---|---|---|---|
|
1a |
Wrought iron |
Fire welded |
31-41 |
|
1b |
Mild steel |
Fire welded |
31-41 |
|
1c |
Mild steel |
Flash butt welded |
31-41 |
|
1d |
Mild steel |
Flash butt welded |
41-50 |
|
2a |
Steel |
Flash butt/drop forged |
50-65 |
|
2b |
Steel |
Cast |
50 min |
|
3a |
Steel |
Flash butt/drop forged |
70 min |
|
3b |
Steel |
Cast |
70 min |
✔ Tip: Forged steel cable offers 40% greater proof test capacity than wrought iron at lower weight, making it increasingly preferred for modern installations.
Cable Sizing Methods
Size measurement references the bar diameter from which individual links are manufactured. Vessel operators determine cable size by consulting chain cable certificates or using external calipers for direct measurement of installed cable. Standard shackle length equals 27.5 m or 15 fathoms.
Size Determination:
► Nominal diameter equals manufacturing bar size
► Certificate documentation provides official size
► External calipers measure installed cable
► One shackle length: 27.5 m standard
► Testing applies to cables 12.5 mm diameter and above
CHAIN CABLE CERTIFICATE REQUIREMENTS
Successful cable testing generates certificates issued by approved Class authorities detailing complete specifications and test results. Documentation proves SOLAS and IACS compliance and operational capabilities for the tested cable length. Certificates remain aboard vessels for inspection by port state control and class surveyors throughout service life.
Certificate Information Listed:
• Cable type and grade classification
• Diameter measured in millimeters
• Total length recorded in meters
• Total weight measured in kilograms
• Link length dimension in millimeters
• Link breadth dimension in millimeters
• Proof load applied in tonnes
• Breaking load applied in tonnes
• Details of accessories supplied if applicable
• Certificate or serial number assignment
• Certifying authority name and stamp
• Testing establishment identification
• Authorized surveyor signature
Chain Marking Standards:
► Certificate number marked on joining shackles or end links
► Certifying authority marks applied to shackles or accessories
► Marking ensures traceability to test certificate
► Identification maintained throughout service life
❔ Did you know? Chain cable certificates must accompany the vessel at all times as authorities may request verification during port state control inspections or class surveys.
JOINING SHACKLE CONFIGURATIONS
Anchor shackles and joining shackles undergo identical tensile and proof load testing as the cable they connect. All accessories must match the cable size specifications and operational requirements. Manufacturing materials and testing protocols ensure reliability under maximum anticipated loads.
Kenter Lugless Joining Shackle
Nickel steel construction provides the most popular joining method for connecting cable shackle lengths. Four main components interlock with precise tolerances ensuring strength and reliability. The tapered spile pin drives diagonally through the assembly with a lead pellet securing it against accidental expulsion.
Construction Details:
• Two main halves interlock precisely
• Stud forms the middle link section
• Tapered spile pin holds assembly together
• Lead pellet fills inverted dovetail recess
• Nickel steel prevents corrosion and freezing
• Relative ease of breaking for maintenance
• Used when end-for-ending cable
• Breaking required for shackle testing
Breaking Procedure:
► Pry out lead pellet from dovetail recess
► Use punch and drift to expel spile pin
► Provide backstop preventing pellet injury
► Extract stud after pin removal
► Separate halves using top swage from manufacturer
► Ream out dovetail recess completely
► Ensure no residual lead remains inside
► Insert new lead pellet during reassembly
❕ Important: Lead pellet may expel with considerable force if not removed before driving the spile pin. Always provide backstop protection for nearby personnel.
Operational Advantages:
• Eliminates need for open end links
• All shackle lengths remain identical
• Smoother gypsy snug engagement
• Shape minimizes catching around bow
• Fits windlass gypsy without jamming
• No additional heat treatment normally required due to nickel steel manufacture
✔ Tip: Kenter shackle size exceeds common links but maintains gypsy compatibility. Ensure it doesn't lie flat on the gypsy to prevent jamming during operations.
'D' Lugged Joining Shackle
Modern vessels extensively employ this shackle type for connecting cable to anchors. Past usage included joining cable shackle lengths together similar to current Kenter applications. Rounded crown portion must face forward preventing anchor fouling during deployment operations.
Orientation Requirements:
► Anchor crown shackle faces opposite direction
► Initial joining shackle reverses from others
► Anchor walks out before letting go
► Lugs may catch if facing wrong direction
► Correct orientation prevents operational snags
► Cable lengths require open links at ends
► Lugs must pass through cable openings
Construction Components:
• Oval bolt passes through lugs
• Bolt crosses jaw of shackle
• Tapered spile pin: steel, brass or wood
• Pin taper ratio: 1:16 specification
• Wood pins: ash or solid bamboo
• Lead pellet secures pin in dovetail recess
• Bolt hammered from unlipped end for removal
Breaking and Assembly:
• Wooden spile pins shear during bolt removal
• Steel pins require punch and drift expulsion
• Tallow smear on bolt eases future breaking
• Heating around lugs aids jammed shackles
• Lug expansion allows bolt withdrawal
• Steel pins typically used for anchor connections
❕ Important: When using 'D' lugged joining shackles between cable lengths, each cable section must incorporate open links at terminating ends to permit lug passage.
ANCHOR AND CABLE DAMAGE FACTORS
Analysis of large vessel operations reveals chain demonstrates greater reliability than anchors on paper. As ship sizes increased, chain reliability improved relative to anchors due to windlass brake slipping and anchors failing to hold rather than chain breaking. Nearly 4% of lost anchors result from improperly closed stoppers allowing vibration to work compression bars upward until they become ineffective.
Common Damage Scenarios:
► Heavy seas impact anchor crowns in hawse pipes
► Inboard driving creates high bending moments
► Constant jarring loosens pins progressively
► Three-point support systems may jam in hawse
► Tug hire required to free jammed anchors
► Shank bending from wind and tide swinging
► Dragging attempts bend high holding power shanks
❔ Did you know? Some anchor designs rely on two flukes and the shank providing three-point support, with the shank wedging into the hawse pipe to prevent rattling. This can create serious jamming problems.
HOLDING POWER VARIABLES
Accurate holding power definition proves difficult due to numerous affecting factors. Anchor type, ground composition, vessel draught, water depth, wind, wave action, current, deadweight and wind area all influence performance. Fluke size and shape determine digging efficiency across various seabed types.
Forces During Anchor Digging
Three forces interact when anchors dig into the seabed. Holding pull applies through the anchor rode consisting of chain or cable. Fluke friction develops against surface areas exerted by bottom soil. Anchor breakout force represents resistance required to extract the anchor from the wedge of bottom soil surrounding embedded flukes.
Critical Performance Factors:
• Scope angle dramatically affects holding power
• Traditional 5:1 scope ratio adequate for average vessels
• Modern large ships require minimum scope angles
• Preferably maintain 0 degree scope angle
• Fluke and weight scaling inadequate for size increases
• Scope ratio: cable length to seabed depth
|
Scope Angle |
Holding Power Effect |
|---|---|
|
0 degrees |
Maximum holding capacity |
|
5 degrees |
Slight reduction from maximum |
|
10 degrees |
Noticeable capacity decrease |
|
15 degrees |
Significant holding reduction |
|
20 degrees |
Major capacity compromise |
|
25 degrees |
Severe holding limitation |
✔ Tip: Test results show holding power drops dramatically as scope angle increases. Keep the cable as horizontal as possible for maximum anchoring effectiveness.
EQUIPMENT NUMBER SCALING ISSUES
Equipment numbers standardize anchor weights and chain sizes based on vessel characteristics. A 25,000 DWT ship requires a 6,450 kg stockless anchor with 605 m of chain having 263 tonne breaking load. Direct scaling suggests a 250,000 DWT vessel would need a 64,500 kg anchor with 6,050 m chain.
Actual Requirements Differ:
► 25,000 DWT: 6,450 kg anchor, 605 m chain
► 50,000 DWT: 8,700 kg anchor, 632.5 m chain
► 100,000 DWT: 12,300 kg anchor, 687.5 m chain
► 250,000 DWT: 18,800 kg anchor, 742.5 m chain
► 500,000 DWT: 29,900 kg anchor, 770 m chain
❕ Important: Traditional sizing rules become inadequate as ships grow larger and heavier. The disproportionate scaling means far greater care must be taken when anchoring and deciding whether to anchor at all.
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE STANDARDS
Dry dock anchor chain inspections require ranging cables out on dock floors for visual examination and diameter measurements. Generally, overhauling of individual shackles gets omitted during routine inspections. Ultra-large crude carriers and very large crude carriers predominantly use cast steel chains.
Link Wear Assessment
Link diameter measurements occur at maximum wear areas using proper gauging techniques. Average diameter calculation takes the mean of two measurements at right angles in the wear zone. Discard criteria applies when reduction exceeds 12% in specified measurement areas.
Measurement Procedure:
• Measure diameter at two perpendicular points
• Calculate average: (d1 + d2) / 2
• Compare against original diameter
• Discard if reduction exceeds 12%
• Focus on maximum wear areas
• Document all measurements systematically
Stud Looseness Criteria
Special survey hull examinations require ranging, gauging and examining anchor chains for stud security. No looseness should exist within links of the anchor cable. Loose studs demand affected cable replacement or welding repairs following approved procedure specifications.
Movement Assessment:
► Loose studs are not permitted during surveys
► Any observed movement assessed by Classification Society
► Acceptance limits depend on chain size, grade and Class requirements
► Missing studs require cable length replacement
► Minor movement may be accepted prior to special survey where approved by Class
► Welding repairs need surveyor approval
✔ Tip: Where studs are completely missing from anchor cable, the affected lengths must be replaced immediately regardless of other chain conditions.
Joining Shackle Inspection
Joining shackles require gauging at points of greatest wear when considered necessary. Replacement consideration begins when wear down equals 12% diameter loss over original dimensions. Kenter shackles demand special attention to tapered locking pin condition during opening procedures.
Kenter Shackle Maintenance:
• Verify tapered locking pin condition
• Steel securing pin held by lead plugs
• Hammer lead plugs for proper fit
• Replace worn or damaged pins immediately
• Check stud orientation during assembly
• Ensure top and bottom align correctly
Swivel Inspection Points:
• Check neck wear carefully
• Excessive wear may release eye piece
• Eye piece loss causes anchor dropping
• Replace eye piece at manufacturer works
• Excessive wear or movement requires replacement per manufacturer or Class limits
• Assessment based on specific swivel design and approval criteria
Anchor Pin Examination
All anchor pins undergo close examination for wear down during inspections. Pin replacement consideration begins when wear down reaches 12% diameter loss. Pin housing strength retention with excessive clearance may permit sleeved connections constraining relative pin and anchor movement.
❕ Important: Where the pin housing retains strength despite excessive clearance, sleeved connections between pin and housing can constrain relative movement effectively.
CHAIN CABLE DAMAGE TYPES
Link breaks typically occur at shoulder sections due to shearing forces. Parallel section breaks indicate welding defects rather than operational failure. Broken chains drop anchors into the sea requiring discovery and recovery from the seabed unless complete renewal becomes necessary.
Break Characteristics
Grade 2 flash butt chain of 32 mm diameter shows minimal deformation in broken links. Fully welded chains elongate adequately before breaking at shoulders from shearing forces. Impact severity may cause additional breaks and stud separation depending on loading conditions.
Break Patterns:
► Shoulder breaks: normal shearing failure
► Parallel section breaks: welding defect indication
► Secondary breaks possible under high impact
► Stud separation from severe loading
► Elongation precedes properly welded link failure
► Defective welds break at welded sections
Bending and Twisting Issues
Links near anchors in chains without swivels sometimes experience bending or twisting. This occurs when anchors rotate while suspended creating torsional loads on adjacent links. Excessive bending or twisting prevents cable passing through windlass gypsy wheels requiring manufacturer repair.
Twist Prevention:
• Install swivels close to anchor connection
• Swivel prevents chain twisting from rotation
• Without swivel, links may twist severely
• Twisted cable jams in windlass gypsy
• Manufacturer repair required for severe cases
• Swivel piece uses even number of links
Blow Hole Defects
Cast steel chains occasionally develop blow holes appearing on surfaces dormant during manufacturer works inspection. Blow holes normally appear in solid links or every joining link. Chains with blow holes go to manufacturer works for proof testing to specified loads. Reinstatement occurs if strength characteristics remain unchanged.
❔ Did you know? Blow holes in cast steel chains may not appear until after the anchor enters service, remaining dormant during initial manufacturing inspections.
WELDING REPAIR PROCEDURES
Securing loose anchor cable studs by welding requires proposal submission to surveyors for evaluation and approval. Approval bases on link repair conditions and remaining link states per permissible wear down criteria. Repairs occur in clean environments with special earthing strap consideration before welding.
Welding Procedure Requirements
Welds follow qualified and approved procedures accepted by surveyors. Consumables shall be approved by the Classification Society and suitable for the relevant chain grade, with low hydrogen characteristics as required. Grades 1 and 2 chain cables use consumables with low hydrogen grading H15 or better. Grade 3 chains demand very low hydrogen grading H5 or better.
Preheating Temperatures:
• Grade 1 and 2: 100°C minimum
• Grade 3: 175°C minimum
• Temperature limits hardness development
• Prevents cold crack risk
• Applied before welding operations commence
Welding Practice:
► Parameters permit large single weld deposits
► Temper bead at stud side allowed
► May be advisable depending on link grade
► Links wrapped after welding for slow cooling
► Qualified welders perform all operations
► Consumables dried per manufacturer recommendations
Testing and Hardness Limits
Approval test procedures represent actual welding conditions accurately. Test sample scope includes macrosection specimens and hardness measurements. Hardness limits shall comply with Class requirements for the specific chain grade and heat treatment condition.
|
Chain Grade |
Hardness Limit |
|---|---|
|
Grade 1 and 2 |
380 Hv10 maximum |
|
Grade 3 normalized/tempered |
380 Hv10 maximum |
|
Grade 3 quenched/tempered |
420 Hv10 maximum |
Repair Execution Steps
Abutting surfaces of links and studs require grinding to produce good fit with acceptable root gap preventing cracking. Surfaces must be free from moisture, grease, rust and contaminants immediately prior to welding. Magnetic particle examination confirms crack absence before welding at surveyor satisfaction.
Welding Execution:
• Stud welded opposite flash butt weld end
• Complete circumference welding required
• Grind all weld stop-starts removing defects
• Blend smoothly with base material
• Visual inspection of all completed welds
• Magnetic or liquid particle examination
• Grade 3 inspection delayed 48 hours minimum
• Studs located centrally at right angles to sides
✔ Tip: For Grade 3 chain cables, delay inspection at least 48 hours after welds cool to ambient temperature ensuring accurate defect detection.
HAWSE PIPE AND CHAIN LOCKER INSPECTION
Hawse pipes and chain pipes require careful examination during surveys. Cracks, deformation and heavy corrosion appear in these high-stress areas. Hawse pipe wear occurs at ends where anchor chain makes contact requiring buildup if grooved conditions develop.
Chain Locker Procedures:
► Treat as enclosed space requiring ventilation
► De-mucking precedes inspection entry
► Shell plates thoroughly inspected at seams
► Bottom chain locker seams critical areas
► Thickness measurements per vessel age
► Special survey requirements for measurements
► Renewal as necessary based on findings
Specific Inspection Points:
• Chain pipe wear requiring rebuilding
• Chain guide wear below windlass
• Bitter end pin wear requiring rebuilding
• All piping condition verification
• Renewal as necessary per surveyor advice
• Bilge well and sounding pipe condition
• Bilge suction pipe integrity
❕ Important: Chain lockers require full enclosed space entry procedures including atmospheric testing, ventilation and rescue equipment readiness before personnel entry.
FAQ
❔ FAQ: What anchor weight requires testing and certification?
All anchors exceeding 76 kg undergo mandatory proof testing with certification issued by approved Class authorities upon successful completion per SOLAS and IACS requirements.
❔ FAQ: How is anchor weight defined for stocked anchors?
Stocked anchor weight includes the anchor body and shackle if present but excludes the stock itself from total weight calculations for testing and regulatory purposes.
❔ FAQ: What is the standard chain cable shackle length?
One shackle of chain cable measures 27.5 meters or 15 fathoms. Testing occurs in these standard lengths with manufacturers providing additional sacrificial links for breaking load testing.
❔ FAQ: Which chain cables require mandatory testing?
Chain cables with diameter of 12.5 mm and above must undergo mandatory testing and certification by approved testing authorities per IACS Unified Requirements.
❔ FAQ: When should chain cable be replaced due to wear?
Chain cable requires replacement when diameter reduction exceeds 12% in maximum wear areas, subject to Classification Society acceptance. This applies to both link bodies and joining shackle components.
❔ FAQ: What causes most anchor losses on vessels?
Investigations indicate that a significant proportion of anchor losses result from improperly closed stoppers allowing vibration to lift compression bars until they lose effectiveness.
❔ FAQ: Can loose studs in anchor cable be welded?
Loose studs may be welded following approved procedures with Class surveyor approval. Welding requires qualified welders, proper preheating, low hydrogen consumables and post-weld examination.
❔ FAQ: What differs between Kenter and 'D' lugged joining shackles?
Kenter shackles join cables with common links only and can connect broken chains anywhere. 'D' lugged shackles require open end links and primarily connect cables to anchors.
❔ FAQ: How does scope angle affect anchor holding power?
Holding power decreases dramatically as scope angle increases. Modern large vessels should maintain scope angles as close to horizontal as practicable for maximum effectiveness.
❔ FAQ: What indicates defective welding in broken chain links?
Links breaking at parallel sections rather than shoulders indicate welding defects. Properly welded chains break at shoulders due to shearing forces under normal loading.
❔ FAQ: Why do some anchor designs jam in hawse pipes?
Designs using three-point support systems with shank and two flukes may wedge into hawse pipes. The shank draws up like a wedge preventing rattling but can require tugs to extract.
GOOD TO KNOW
Historical Anchor Development: Egyptian river vessels used stone-filled baskets as primitive anchors around 6000 BC in the Nile and Mediterranean waters, marking the earliest known ground tackle systems.
Chain Cable Introduction: Robert Flinn of South Shields created the first acceptable iron anchor chains at the beginning of the 19th century, revolutionizing anchoring systems previously dependent on rope.
Joining Shackle Innovation: British Naval officer Samuel Brown invented joining shackles concurrent with chain development, with swivels following in 1811 completing the modern cable system.
Royal Navy Adoption: The British Royal Navy decided in 1830 to equip all ships with iron anchor chains, with merchant vessels following by 1840 once reliability proved acceptable.
Testing Standards Establishment: Lloyd's Register made chain cable testing mandatory in 1853 before vessels could receive classification, followed shortly by length and strength regulations.
Steel Chain Acceptance: Lloyd's Register generally accepted steel chain and anchor in 1913 after extensive testing proved superior performance over iron alternatives.
CQR Design Origin: Scientist Sir Geoffrey Taylor invented the CQR plough-share anchor despite having little boating experience, demonstrating how basic principles sometimes surpass practical experience.
Danforth Holding Power: Danforth anchors achieve approximately 14 times their own weight in holding power but tend to glide along the seabed before flukes bite effectively.
AC14 Weight Reduction: Classification societies granted 25% weight reduction for AC14 high holding power anchors recognizing they provide more than twice the holding capacity of equivalent weight stockless designs.
Equipment Number Disproportions: Traditional linear scaling rules fail for modern large vessels. A 250,000 DWT ship needs only 18,800 kg anchors rather than the 64,500 kg direct scaling would suggest.
Anchor Not Designed For: IACS explicitly states anchoring equipment cannot hold vessels off fully exposed coasts in rough weather or stop ships that are moving or drifting due to excessive energy generation.
Poor Holding Ground Impact: Even properly sized and tested anchors experience significantly reduced holding power in poor seabed conditions compared to good holding ground performance.
Windlass Brake Slipping: As ships became larger, apparent improved chain reliability over anchors often resulted from windlass brakes slipping rather than actual chain superiority.
Forged Steel Advantage: Forged steel cable has 40% greater proof test capacity than wrought iron while weighing less, making it increasingly preferred despite higher initial costs.
Swivel Link Numbers: Regular shackles contain odd numbers of links ensuring joining shackles always occupy the same gypsy position. Swivel pieces use even link numbers to remove cable twists.
Nickel Steel Benefits: Kenter shackle nickel steel construction prevents corrosion and parts freezing together, allowing relatively easy breaking for cable end-for-ending or shackle testing.
Tallow Application: 'D' lugged joining shackle bolts receive tallow smears during assembly allowing easier breaking at later dates when maintenance or inspection requires disassembly.
Lead Pellet Ejection Hazard: If not removed before driving spile pins, lead pellets may expel with considerable force from percussion effects, requiring backstop protection for personnel safety.
Cast Steel Chain Applications: Ultra-large crude carriers and very large crude carriers predominantly use cast steel chains due to size requirements and strength characteristics.
Blow Hole Dormancy: Cast steel chain blow holes sometimes remain dormant during manufacturer works inspection, only appearing after the anchor enters operational service.
Regulatory Compliance Note: All testing requirements, certification procedures and technical specifications in this blog align with SOLAS regulations, IACS Unified Requirements (UR A1/A2) and major Classification Society standards including ABS, DNV, LR and BV.

